You are here: HomeNews2019 03 04Article 727882

General News of Monday, 4 March 2019

Source: Class FM

Agongo's lawyer halts Opuni trial over CRIG report


Click to read all about coronavirus →

Mr Benson Nutsukpui, counsel for businessman Seidu Agongo, who is standing trial together with a former Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD), Dr Stephen Opuni, has filed a motion to stay proceedings in the ongoing criminal prosecution against them until the determination of an appeal against a ruling that blocked an attempt by the defence team to tender in evidence the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG) committee’s investigative report through the state's second prosecution witness, Dr Alfred Arthur.

The court ruled previously against Mr Nutsukpui's tendering of the CRIG document at the last sitting before Monday’s hearing.

Class91.3FM’s Joshua Qoudjo-Mensah, who was in court on Monday, 4 March 2018 said Mr Nutsukpui is challenging the court’s ruling and wants the trial halted until the determination of the interlocutory appeal.

He said the Director of Public Prosecutions, Yvonne Atakora Obuobisa, suggested that the hearing proceeds since she had not been served with a copy of the motion.

However, the presiding judge, Justice C.Y. Hornyenuga ruled that the Director of Public Prosecutions and counsel for the first accused (Dr Stephen Opuni) be served with copies of the motion.

The court had upheld an objection raised by Mrs Obuobisa against the tendering of the report.

Mr Nutsukpui, in his cross-examination of Dr Arthur on Monday, 25 February 2019, sought to tender the CRIG investigative report on some key missing documents, through the witness.

But this was objected to by Mrs Obuobisa, who argued that the report is hearsay evidence under Section 116 of the Evidences Act since it was made by persons other than the witness, who is currently testifying in court.

In her estimation, it would be unfair to tender the document through the second prosecution witness since he neither appeared before the investigative committee nor knew of the committee's work.

She further cast doubts over the authenticity of the document since, according to her, it was not captured on the official letterhead of CRIG, despite it being filed by the lawyer for the directors of CRIG and the Cocoa Health and Extension Division (CHED).

But in his counter-argument, Mr Agongo’s counsel, Mr Nutsukpui described as unfair, the prosecution’s attempt to taint the credibility of the said document.

Mr Nutsukpui argued that the fact that the lawyer for the directors of CRIG and CHED filed the said document in court pursuant to orders of the presiding judge and on behalf of the directors of CRIG, who are custodians of the document, is enough basis for the court to consider the document as reasonably trustworthy, referring the court to the case of Yeboah v Amofa reported in 1997 - 98 1 Ghana Law Report (1 GLR) Act 647.

He further argued that it will not be the correct position of the law if the court is made to believe, per the argument of the DPP, that since Dr Arthur did not author the report, it could not be tendered through him.

According to Mr Nutsukpui, that argument is defeated, since Dr Arthur has tendered, in evidence, official documents he did not author at all.

He added that it is also the right of the accused persons to be able to confront the witness with documentation, which Dr Arthur denies exists, adding that the CRIG document is proper and should be accepted.

Justice Hornyenuga at that hearing upheld the DPP’s objection on the grounds that it would be most unfair to tender a document through a witness who does not appear to know anything about the said document.

He added that it would be appropriate for the counsel for Mr Agongo to seek an order from the court to invite the authors of the report and tender the document through them after scrutiny.

The case has been adjourned to 13 March 2019.

Dr Opuni and Mr Agongo are facing 27 charges of willfully causing financial loss of GHS217 million to the state, through three separate fertiliser supply contracts between 2014 and 2016.

The contracts were GHS43.1million (2013/2014 cocoa farming season), GHS75.3million (2014/2015 cocoa farming season) and GHS98.9million (2015/2016 cocoa farming season) totalling GHS217million through sole-sourcing, the state claimed, adding that procurement procedures for sole-sourcing were not followed.

According to the charges, the consignments of Lithovit Foliar were produced locally, contrary to an agreement between COCOBOD and AgriCult Ghana Company Limited that it be sourced from Germany.

Send your news stories to and via WhatsApp on +233 55 2699 625.

Join our Newsletter