Source: Sankofaonline News Desk : January 21, 2026

The Tough Minded Immigration Judge Now Presiding Over Ken OforiAtta’s Deportation Case
As former Ghanaian Finance Minister Ken OforiAtta faces deportation proceedings in the United States, attention has shifted to the man who will ultimately decide his fate: Immigration Judge David A. Gardey of the Arlington Immigration Court. His background, judicial record, and professional philosophy offer important clues about how he approaches immigration cases, and what that might mean for one of the most highprofile African political figures currently before the U.S. immigration system.
This analysis draws exclusively from publicly available data, including the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), Department of Justice records, and Judge Gardey’s professional history.
A Career Built Inside the U.S. Justice System
Judge David A. Gardey joined the immigration bench in August 2023, but he is far from a newcomer to the American legal system. His résumé reflects nearly three decades of federal prosecution, elite legal practice, and judicial experience.
Education
Yale University, B.A., 1990
Notre Dame Law School, J.D., 1993
Early Legal Career
1993–1995: Judicial law clerk, U.S. District Court (Michigan)
1995–1997: Associate, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (New York)
1997–2001: Supervisory attorney, Butzel Long PC (Detroit)
Federal Prosecution Career
Judge Gardey spent 22 years as a federal prosecutor, an unusually long tenure that shaped his reputation as a meticulous, toughminded legal professional.
U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida (2001–2005)
Handled major federal cases in Miami, one of the busiest immigration and narcotics jurisdictions in the country.
U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Michigan (2005–2023)
Held senior leadership roles including:
Special Counsel to the U.S. Attorney
Chief, Public Corruption & Civil Rights Unit
Chief, Drug Task Force Unit
This background is significant: prosecutors who specialize in corruption, civil rights, and narcotics often develop a strict, evidencedriven approach to adjudication. That prosecutorial mindset frequently carries over when they become judges.
Judge Gardey is licensed in Michigan and New York.
His Record on Immigration: A High Denial Rate
TRAC data covering FY 2020–2025 (first 11 months of 2025) shows that Judge Gardey has decided 177 asylum cases on their merits.
Outcomes
144 denied
30 granted asylum
3 granted other forms of relief
Overall Denial Rate: 81.4%
This places him far above:
National average denial rate: 58.9%
Arlington Immigration Court average: 51.5%
In other words, Judge Gardey denies asylum at a significantly higher rate than both his court and the nation as a whole.
This does not necessarily mean he is “antiimmigrant.” It does, however, suggest:
A strict interpretation of asylum law
A high evidentiary threshold
A prosecutorial mindset that prioritizes credibility, documentation, and consistency
Why His Denial Rate Matters
Immigration judges’ decisions are shaped by:
Judicial philosophy
Case composition
Whether respondents are detained
Quality of legal representation
Nationality of applicants
Federal immigration policy at the time
Representation
Only 5.6% of asylum seekers before Judge Gardey lacked legal representation, far lower than the national average of 17.1%.
This means his high denial rate cannot be explained by unrepresented applicants.
Nationality of Applicants
His caseload is dominated by:
El Salvador (19.8%)
Honduras (13.0%)
Peru (9.6%)
Bolivia (8.5%)
Nicaragua (7.9%)
These countries have historically mixed asylum outcomes, but not low enough to explain an 81% denial rate on their own.
Thus, the data suggests that Judge Gardey’s judicial philosophy is a major factor.
What Does This Mean for Ken OforiAtta?
While every case is unique, several publicly observable factors may shape the former minister’s prospects:
Judge Gardey’s Background
His long career in:
Public corruption prosecution
Civil rights enforcement
Drug task force leadership
The foregoing suggests a judge who is:
Detailoriented
Evidencedriven
Unmoved by political status
Comfortable handling highprofile or sensitive cases
His High Denial Rate
An 81.4% denial rate indicates a judge who:
Applies asylum law narrowly
Demands strong, welldocumented claims
Is skeptical of claims lacking corroboration
OforiAtta’s Case Is Not an Asylum Case (Based on Public Information)
He is reportedly in removal (deportation) proceedings, not an asylum claim.
However, the same judicial temperament, strict, procedural, evidence focused, will apply.
Representation Will Matter
OforiAtta reportedly has a U.S. legal team.Given that unrepresented applicants fare poorly nationwide, this is a critical advantage.
Public Profile Cuts Both Ways
Highprofile respondents:
Receive more scrutiny
Face fewer credibility assumptions
Must present airtight legal arguments
Judge Gardey’s prosecutorial background suggests he will not be swayed by political stature.