This blog is managed by the content creator and not GhanaWeb, its affiliates, or employees. Advertising on this blog requires a minimum of GH₵50 a week. Contact the blog owner with any queries.

Harry Graphic Blog of Tuesday, 11 November 2025

Source: Harry Graphic

Minority boycotting the vetting of Chief Justice Bonnie was premeditated - Dr. Dramani Bukari

Comments (0)

  • Share:
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter

Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the National Petroleum Authority (NPA), Dr. Dramani Bukari, has alleged that the Minority’s decision to boycott the vetting of Chief Justice nominee Justice Bonnie was a premeditated political act.

Speaking on GTV’s Breakfast Show, Dr. Bukari argued that the boycott was not a spontaneous protest but rather a calculated move aimed at undermining the credibility of the appointment process. He described the action as unfortunate and counterproductive to Ghana’s democratic growth, noting that such political theatrics only serve to erode public trust in key state institutions.

According to Dr. Bukari, prior indications from certain Minority members suggested that they had no intention of participating in the vetting, regardless of the circumstances. He explained that statements made before the official sitting hinted at a deliberate attempt to politicize the nomination of Justice Bonnie, who is widely respected in the legal community.

Dr. Bukari emphasized that vetting processes should be treated as a national duty rather than a partisan exercise, as the judiciary plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of power and ensuring justice for all citizens.

The NPA Deputy CEO further urged Parliament to strengthen its institutional culture by ensuring that constitutional processes are respected by all political actors, irrespective of their party affiliations. He expressed disappointment that political strategies often take precedence over national interest and called on both sides of the House to demonstrate maturity and patriotism in their parliamentary engagements.

Dr. Bukari concluded that while dissent is a legitimate part of democracy, it must not come at the expense of the country’s democratic integrity and the smooth functioning of its constitutional bodies.