You are here: HomeWallOpinionsArticles2016 05 27Article 442210

Opinions of Friday, 27 May 2016

Columnist: Ablorh Raymond

Corruption: An everlasting item on Ghana's elections agenda

It's a fact that corruption is not only depriving Ghana of resources meant for development, but also accelerating the depreciation of trust and goodwill citizens have for her public office holders at all level.

It is-undoubtedly- a fast growing threat to Ghana's highly praised democracy.

Ghana's Auditor-General's Report in 2014 revealed the country lost GHc2.6 billion to corruption and mismanagement. Previous years recorded similar heart-breaking figures. And it appears the future looks bleaker.

Franklin Cudjoe, the founding President of IMANI Ghana, a leading Civil Society Organisation in Africa has observed recently: "my estimation of all corruption involving politicians and civil service in Ghana is about $3bn-$4bn annually and that's almost 10% of Ghana's GDP and that it's a big deal."

There is, certainly, no surer way to spark a spirited argument than to ensure the issue of corruption is on the front burner in our political discuss as the nation prepares for the seventh Presidential and Parliamentary elections in her Fourth Republic.

Unfortunately, Ghanaian politicians and political parties have not shown the leadership and commitment required to address the bribery and corruption problem the country has faced since it attained independence. In opposition, they seemed to have the panacea, but, in government, they got caught up in same or bigger scandals than what they condemned.

This is because the systems are rooted in corruption and many of the people and institutions that have the responsibility to protect the interest of the public are themselves beneficiaries of the various corrupt acts they are supposed to fight against.

President John Dramani Mahama, who doubles as National Democratic Congress flag-bearer at the just concluded anti-corruption conference in United Kingdom was praised as an exemplary performer in the fight against corruption in the sub-region.

when quizzed by journalist on corruption cases in his government, the president boldly challenged citizens to name the corrupt men in his cabinet and provide proof.

In a swift response from Occupy Ghana (OG)- a transparency and accountability advocacy group - washed ashore the devils in the details of the Smarttys deal linking the bus branding scandal which caused the resignation of Road and Transport Minister, Dzifa Ativor, to the Presidency.

The Presidency has answered OG's call with a very loud silence.

Meanwhile, his toughest opponent Nana Addo Danquah Akuffo-Addo, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) flagbearer has also reiterated a call he has made several times, "I am not seeking the high office of this land because I want to steal your money and line my pockets with the nation's resources".

His supporters say he is 'incorruptible'.

Of course, it is not enough to say 'I am incorruptible'; 'I will not steal your money'. Or, 'I have not taken bribe before'; 'I have fought corruption better than previous administrations did'.

Critical minded electorates will need more than self-justification and promises to decide on who to vote for; because corruption has always been on election campaign tables, yet, citizens have not seen any meaningful political will and commitment exhibited in the fight against the nation's resources robber over the years.

However, President John Mahama and the NDC will be judged based on their efforts against corruption than on new promises.

Nana Akuffo-Addo and the NPP will also be voted for - not based on their promises - but on how they fought corruption from 2001 to 2008 when they were in power, how they are presently addressing internal corruption allegations, and strategic plan to curb corruption when they win election

Since 2009, the NDC government has suffered numerous heartbreaking corruption scandals. The President says this administration has addressed these cases better than past governments did.

According to him, his government has investigated and retrieved various amounts of monies from those found culpable and others are being prosecuted.

He argues that unlike previous administrations, his does not cover up, but rather - further exposes acts of corruption when it surface and transparently probes them for remedial actions.

But, many Ghanaians are of the opinion that measures government is employing to address corruption cases are not stringent enough.

Instead of applying strict preventive measures to save the nation's resources from pouring into individuals' pockets, government seems to be concentrating more on curative measures which are not addressing - critically- the numerous scandals fluttering their wings across the media landscape.

Nevertheless, the incumbent is not the only one battling allegations of corruption scandals; Paul Afoko, the suspended NPP Chairman and other members of the main Opposition have raised serious issues regarding financial malfeasance in their party and the Flag-bearer has been blamed for endorsing such ill-acts.

Members of the incumbent party and other well-meaning citizens are arguing that if the opposition candidate cannot ensure transparency and accountability in his party, much cannot be expected of him in government.

Some supporters of the NPP, however, say that the Constitution of their party does not say the flag-bearer is the leader of the party, so he should not be blamed for the transparency and accountability challenges the party is facing.

Legible voters however need Nana Akuffo-Addo to ensure transparency and accountability reign in his party as a demonstration of his corruption fighting competence.

How political parties are funded in Ghana can partly explain why it is difficult to kill the "kick-back" phenomenon.

Many of those who fund the parties are not philanthropists. The political parties and some very important party and government functionaries are direct or indirect beneficiaries of various corrupt acts in officialdom thus making the fight against corruption suicidal to them.

Anna Bossman, a former Commissioner for Human Right and Administrative Justice was more than right when she said in her interview with Africa Watch Magazine in 2011 that, "as a society, we condone it and we do not have robust systems that would allow us to even trace and monitor properly. And then, when we do monitor and find things, we do not sanction. We turn a blind eye." The situation has not changed much.

But, regardless of who wins the 2016 elections, the government of Ghana will have to show more will power than she has ever done - to reduce corruption appreciably. And, that can only be achieved if civil society organizations, media and individual social accountability advocates increase their resolve to demand transparency and accountability from duty bearers at all levels.

Author: Raymond Ablorh is a Social Entrepreneur, Journalist, Corporate Communications Strategist and a prolific Feature Writer who has contributed articles to the Daily Graphic and other local and international media since the year 2000.