You are here: HomeOpinionsArticles2013 09 12Article 285276

Why the case of the petitioners ‘succeeded’

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (21)

  • Carl 10 years ago

    There were six issues to be determined.Three were unanimous dismissed by all nine judges and three were on majority decision of 5-4 so it is only the imbecile who will read it differently.Even the mischievous will be ridicul ...
    read full comment

  • Sam 10 years ago

    Gabby is surely going mental. He seems to have felt the shock of the verdict more than his cousin. Gabby is playing family game. He won't understand after all he is said to be a lazy lawyer so the verdict is beyond his unders ...
    read full comment

  • Bernard 10 years ago

    Carl, i could not agree with you more than to laugh my hearts out loud. I believe either Gabby is refusing to take his anti depressant medication or his doctor has not diagnossed him properly and gave him the wrong prescript ...
    read full comment

  • Nana Yaw 10 years ago

    There is nothing presidential about Akuffo Addo and majority of Ghanaians spoke loud and clear. Akuffo Addo can not become president of Dr Kwame Nkrmuah's Ghana with two twi speaking Akan regions out the 10 regions. Ghanaians ...
    read full comment

  • Jim 10 years ago

    Gabby is out of his mind, period, point, blank!!!!

  • Nana Yaw 10 years ago

    The tribalist sore losers are shocked they could not succeed in using the Kuffour packed supreme court to steal the elections from president Mahama. Bunch of goofballs!!

  • DR Bokor JNR 10 years ago

    sometimes i wish people will leave comments on here that make some sense. wtf.... I just think people don't have the common sense to "chew" on the logic in this article

  • John Anamse 10 years ago

    What is Gabby seeing that every body else is not seeing?

    So the SC judges can have their decision twisted in this manner and they cannot complain but Gabby sees the vision on their behalf and can only explain it at the Bri ...
    read full comment

  • Yag 10 years ago

    Maybe too much money from JB,s property near Great Portland London ,Euston Road

  • Kwami - US 10 years ago

    Was this writer born then? If he were, did he actually pay attention to events leading to the verdict? 5 for Bush and 4 for Gore! Did the verdict imply that Gore had "succeeded"? Oh! "Common sense is not common to common peop ...
    read full comment

  • WUNTIRA 10 years ago

    Over voting: Atuguba, Adinyira, Akoto-Bamfo, Gbadegbe, Baffoe Bonnie dismissed it by 5:4 majority.

    Voting without Biometric verification: Atuguba, Adinyira, Akoto-Bamfo, Gbadegbe, Dotse dismissed it by 5:4 majority.

    Pre ...
    read full comment

  • Victor A Attah.Syracuse NY 10 years ago

    Gabby, I have admired your writing skills after you took over the Statesman newspaper a few years back.You do remind me of your uncle Frazer of the defunct Evening News and grandpa the late Kwame Kesse Adu of Ashanti Pioneer ...
    read full comment

  • Nti Marfo Joshua 10 years ago

    Delusion, hallucination, Shock, Denial, Dazed. That's the state Gabby and the NPP are in now. With time, they'll move to sobering reflection and full acceptance.
    Accept our sympathies. Gabby.

  • Kobena 10 years ago

    Gabby,
    You are right in your analysis. I said right from the beginning that the Supreme Court had boxed itself into a tight corner, by crstallising the petition into two issues: Were there any irregularities? Did they affect ...
    read full comment

  • Carl 10 years ago

    Another illogical statement full of mistaken believes.In every elections as in every human endeavour perfection can not be expected hence the questions posed by the judges.Were there irregularities and if there were, were the ...
    read full comment

  • Kobena 10 years ago

    The problem with most of Ghanaians these days is we have lost the ability to critically think through issues, and so resort to insults when we cannot match other people’s arguments. If in an election the difference between ...
    read full comment

  • Carl 10 years ago

    The judges took into consideration the mathematics before concluding that those minor errors were insufficient to affect he result.I wonder why you think otherwise if not because of your parochial partisan bias.

    Kobena you ...
    read full comment

  • K. Tawiah 10 years ago

    What is wrong with you, Kobena? Your analysis is so poor that I wonder what kind of maths you did read. May be the maths books you read were authored by Jake and Nana Akuffo Addo! Hahahahaha.

  • Kobena 10 years ago

    Obviously you do not know the difference between 2% and 33.3%!

  • dennis awah 10 years ago

    This gabby guy is a joke????? he criticizes the judges for an error in the announcement of the verdict but he announces that he will have a "symposium" at the british council only for us to learn that british council never ag ...
    read full comment

  • Whatever 10 years ago

    Using selective presentation of facts to put up a lone banner of success... how pathetic. Even where you had some sort of grounding, you lost there because your claims were an affront to the "spirit" of the 1992 constitution ...
    read full comment