You are here: HomeBusiness2021 02 20Article 1185109

Politics of Saturday, 20 February 2021

Source: classfmonline.com

NDC, NDP to march over election petition qualms February 25

File photo: The two political parties have scheduled Thursday, 25 February 2021 for their protest File photo: The two political parties have scheduled Thursday, 25 February 2021 for their protest

The Joint Committee of the NDP and NDC has notified the police of a planned peaceful demonstration by the members of the National Democratic Party (NDP) and the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and some civil society organizations (CSOs) in accordance with the Public Order Act.

The demonstration is scheduled for Thursday, 25 February 2021, from 7:30 am.

The demonstrators will start from the Obra Spot at the Kwame Nkrumah Circle and walk through the principal streets of Accra to the EC Headquarters, Supreme Court and end at the Mantse Agbona Park.

A letter co-signed by a founding father of the NDP, Owusu Cobbiah Richard, and a member of the NDC, Kobby Ramson, on 18 February 2021, stated that purpose of the march is to draw international attention to the ongoing election petition at the Supreme Court through which former President John Mahama is challenging the results of the December 2020 presidential election results.

The group says its members have qualms about the proceedings.

Mr Mahama recently filed for a review of a decision by the court which said he could not reopen his case.

The Supreme Court, on Tuesday, 16 February 2021, ruled unanimously that Mr Mahama could not reopen his case for the sole purpose of subpoenaing the star witness of the EC and using her as an "adverse" witness.

Chief Justice Anin Yeboah read the ruling, which quoted several authorities to buttress the court's position.

"A mere filing of a witness statement is not an election to testify", Justice Anin Yeboah said.

He continued: "As we’ve already indicated in this ruling supra, the petitioner in this application has not given us an inkling of the new or fresh evidence he wants to bring to the fore through the Chairperson of the first respondent and how that evidence could assist the court to do justice to the matters under consideration in this petition. Neither has he disclosed how that evidence will advance the cause of his petition.

“For the above-stated reasons, we find no merit or favour in the petitioner’s application to reopen his case for the sole purpose of compelling his adversaries’ intended witness to testify through a subpoena without indicating the sort of evidence he intends to solicit from the said witness and how that evidence is going to help the court in resolving the dispute before us. We accordingly refuse the application and proceed without any hesitation to dismiss it", the ruling said.

However, Mr Mahama, in a review application filed by his lawyers, said the court committed errors in law in its ruling.

“I am advised by counsel and verily believe the court made fundamental errors of law including the ruling being per incuriam of constitutional provisions, statutes and previous decisions of the Supreme Court”, parts of the application said.

“Among these errors, I am advised by counsel and verily believe is an error whereby the court's subordinates a provision in the Evidence Act to a rule in subsidiary legislation by the Rules of Court Committee,” he noted.

According to him, “the fundamental errors, which have occasioned a miscarriage of justice are set out in the statement of case herewith attached”.

“I am advised and verily believe that they constitute exceptional circumstances that warrant the court reviewing its own decision”, he argued.

The court will hear the application on Monday, 22 February 2021.