You are here: HomeBusiness2021 07 16Article 1310998

Business News of Friday, 16 July 2021


Blind loyalty bane of Ghana’s development – Governance Expert

Governance Expert, Dr Valentine Mensah Governance Expert, Dr Valentine Mensah

Ghanaians must do away with blind loyalty and unquestioned obedience to authority if they want to develop under a democracy, a governance expert has said.

Dr Valentine Mensah noted the poor Ghanaian socio-political culture has affected every facet of the governance structure and its crippling Ghana’s fledgling democracy.

He made the remark during a Corporate Governance Faculty Lecture organized by ICAG on the theme; “Dysfunctional Executive Oversight and Accountability in Ghana.”

The lecture was to tease out some of the challenges and bottlenecks that have bedeviled Ghana’s democratic development and recommend possible solutions.

The keynote speaker believes anachronistic culture is one of Ghana’s biggest headaches in its democratic development.

In his detailed presentation, Dr Mensah who is also a Board Member of the Graphic Communications Group Ltd said even though Ghana had independence with South Korea around the same time and shares some cultural similarities with the exception of long term orientation, the Asian country is now described as a developed country whilst Ghana still wallow in the economic doldrums.

Explaining the gaping difference in the development of the two countries, Dr Mensah walked participants of the lecture through G Hofstede (2001), research, titled dimensions of culture which sought to explore how culture addresses fundamental issues, including the relationship with authority, people and change.

Culture and development

Hofstede had five cultural value dimensions and how they correspond with mental programs or behaviours of citizens in eight different countries - Ghana, Nigeria, South Korea, South Korea, Canada, Australia, US, and UK.

Among these five dimensions include how citizens related to those in authority (Power Distance); whether or not policymakers were short-sighted or had a long-term planning policy regime (Long Term Orientation) or whether or not they were individualistic in their decision making.

Quoting the findings of the research, Dr Mensah said Ghana, Nigeria, and South Korea scored high marks in power distance which meant the citizens of Ghana and Nigeria kept a distance from their leaders without proper oversight and accountability but Ghana scored abysmally low (4) on Long Term Orientation which relates to focus on the future, a savings culture and long term development planning.

South Korea on the other hand scored a not too distant mark from Ghana on Power Distance but attained a 100 percent mark on long-term orientation which influenced their long-term policy initiatives.

That according to Dr Mensah is the game-changer for South Korea and has led to massive development in the Asian country.

The governance expert, replicated Hofstede’s study in Ghana for his Ph.D. in 2008 using Customs officials across the ten regions. The outcome was not significantly different from the original study, pointing to the dire consequences of a backward-looking culture.

This must change, Dr Mensah noted, adding, leadership in Ghana must begin to work on the cultural consciousness of the citizens and ensure it works favourably for Ghana’s developmental agenda.

Dr Valentine Mensah said Ghana may continue to needlessly blame democracy as an alien political system of governance if it fails to transform the cultural and traditional belief systems of its citizens.

The Lecture, on zoom, had participants from various accounting firms, public and corporate institutions.

President of ICAG, Prof William Atuilik said governments must begin to take a critical look at the policies they implement and ensure they are sustainable long-term policies.

He said the ICAG will begin to play a major role in the accountability architecture of governance and make recommendations where necessary.

He said for members of institutions that disburses funds, it will be an abdication of responsibility if they do not hold the authority to account.