You are here: HomeNews2016 07 05Article 452925

Our take on Lydia Forson’s text on Kennedy-Agyapong controversy 1

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (38)

  • Mr Bond 7 years ago

    Why don't you mine your own business and leave Lydia alone since Lydia is not your co equal.It is a shame that you are a male kokonsa and mingle yourself in people's business.Let the wen deal with her.Shame on you.

  • kwame 7 years ago

    Hey!! write simple English for people to read and comprehend, I don't even want to know what your target patrons are, though. Be informed that, communication becomes more effective, if the message can be decoded easilly by i ...
    read full comment

  • ADJOA WANGARA 7 years ago

    Francis kwarteng is useless from his feet to his twisted empty head.

    He is simply stupid and goes with silly write ups.

  • THE TRUTH 7 years ago

    What does Kwarteng want to achieve with this empty write up,ecxept of showing that he can use big big english words whhich no one will give him credit for.Nobody give a damn of this show off.

  • unnecessary english 7 years ago

    l agree with you 100%. This writer is not an effective communicator. I stopped reading along the way when I realised he only decided to display his ability to use dictionary to do write ups. He has no way done communication ...
    read full comment

  • Osei Boakye 7 years ago

    Mr. Bond, Kwame, madam ADJOA WANDARA and those bashing Francis Kwarteng, hurry up and build ur vocabulary so that you are able, next time to grasp the dialogue between the encoder & the decoder.

    Those who are having tough ...
    read full comment

  • Francis kwarteng 7 years ago

    Well said my good brother. You could not have said it better.

  • kwame 7 years ago

    Osei Boakye, you are the most outstanding stooge of all time, who has also been confined to the same state of communication illiteracy, if you care to know, communication is a two -way traffic between the sender and the recei ...
    read full comment

  • Osei Boakye 7 years ago

    Your analysis is correct, however, you are making those receiving the message go scotfree by not tasking them to make attempt to upgrade their limited vocabulary. The sender of the message - here - the encoder, has the righ ...
    read full comment

  • Kobby G. 7 years ago

    All this in response to Lydia's simple article which implores us not to be selective in defending women under attack from men like Kennedy Agyapong? Give us a break!

  • TRUTH AND INTEGRITY 7 years ago

    The writer in my opinion, could have presented his opinion in plain, simple language. No doubt, the writer has good vocabulary, but could have done better in this writeup to convey his opinion simple and clearly.

  • The Ruler Is Back 7 years ago

    Why do you quickly delete your scripts? I thought they were in good taste. Now you are changing your stories. I thought you blacks enjoy cursing yourselves, for whiteman money so why the quick retreat and retracts of words. T ...
    read full comment

  • paul 7 years ago

    useless woman

  • No Need 7 years ago

    I've read ten paragraphs n find it difficult continuing. The author should endeavor to use much fewer but easy to understand jargons. Even an academic articles demand the use of simple vocabularies one wants wide readership!

  • kwame 7 years ago

    l think his target readers are Oxford, Harvard, Yale and Princeton English professors. This is a stupid script and I believe the author is a communication illiterate. He lacks the basic principles of communication. Of coures ...
    read full comment

  • Francis making a fool of himself 7 years ago

    Kwame, Francis' English is for nobody but himself. As in all his previous articles, this is just a repeat of his usual showmanship...showmanship that will take him and his writing to the English language gallows.

  • Akua Mansa 7 years ago

    Cacophony

    Full of sound and fury signifying nothing

  • Benny 7 years ago

    I don't think the author of this article actually wanted to communicate. He/she wanted to show some form of swag in the use of english words.

  • Kweku 7 years ago

    Who is interested in this trash, Mr Kwarteng ? you make reading boring and painful. Truth is that you are not impressing anybody here, OK?

  • adamsey 7 years ago

    I think you write very well but this could only impress lectures at the department of political science especially those doing political philosophy.You see you have Good points but who like to read an interesting article with ...
    read full comment

  • Francis making a fool of himself 7 years ago

    Francis, you are so full of it and you know what! Can you for the life of you explain 'auctorial', 'occasionlist', 'phenomelogy', 'occasionalist' 'imprimamatur'. Or better yet can you cite any ENGLISH dictionary where we can ...
    read full comment

  • BOAFO YENA 7 years ago

    Brother Kwarteng is teaching us: practice using some of his vocabs.

  • Dr. BAD 7 years ago

    Who is Francis writing for? A group of octogenarian professors of philosophy, or simply showboating with the English language? Lydia Forson's piece was more punchy and meaningful than this vain attempt to subject it to litera ...
    read full comment

  • Dr. BAD 7 years ago

    Who is Francis writing for? A group of octogenarian professors of philosophy, or he's simply showboating with the English language? Lydia Forson's piece was more punchy and meaningful than this vain attempt to subject it to l ...
    read full comment

  • AHENEBOBOA ANO 7 years ago

    Very typical, you are one of the idiots that think using unfamiliar vocabs will never make them shakespear, my friend, what's the sense in it after wasting your time and energy to write and readers can't understand you, damn
    ...
    read full comment

  • Joe 7 years ago

    Today the npp folks are eulogizing Lydia Forson because her write ups seems to meets the aspirations of the npp in terms of the way they see the NDC.

    I hope tomorrow Kennedy-Adjapong would not come to hunt and insult her j ...
    read full comment

  • Colo 7 years ago

    Is the writer okay. No serious minded person will string together unnecessary words wasting everyone's time with such a long article.

  • Francis making a fool of himself 7 years ago

    It may sound cacophony to you but you just have to follow the threads to today's Kwarteng's article to know that people are just fed up with his crappy and 'book long'writing. May be you need to bellow 'cacophony' in Francis' ...
    read full comment

  • thelynq 7 years ago

    what? make me understand you please. This is not a dissertation lol. please!!!

  • SAM 7 years ago

    FRANCIS IF YOUR AIM FOR WRITIG THIS PIECE WAS TO PROVE TO LYDIA FORSON THAT YOU HAVE BETTER VOCABULARY THEN YOU HAVE SUCCEEDED.

  • popie qatar 7 years ago

    what kind of English is this

  • Boss 7 years ago

    Hahaha as in my school we will say Sheebono for the English. Absolutely useless article.

  • Prince Charles 7 years ago

    This guy again?

  • Dzadza 7 years ago

    We these kind of English when our dear Ghana is going to ditch, we don't have electricity our salary is low and we have people who write like this when Akua Donkor, Ayariga, Koku Anyidoho, Kofi Adams, Central Region women, RC ...
    read full comment

  • Dzadza 7 years ago

    We have these kind of English when our dear country is going to a ditch, we don't have electricity our salary is low and we have people who can write like this when Akua Donkor, Ayariga, Koku Anyidoho, Kofi Adams, Central Reg ...
    read full comment

  • Kwadwo Apau 7 years ago

    Who is this columnist Frank Kwarteng trying to impress upon? Is he trying to tell us he knows the English language more than the English man? Use simple language. Professor KA Busia wouldn't have written like that.

  • Kwame Joe 7 years ago

    Why didn't you cite Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, who wrote lots of books read the world over ?

  • opannaF 7 years ago

    Foolish Girl stop your nasty and demonic act. stupid lady