You are here: HomeNews2019 12 10Article 811282

General News of Tuesday, 10 December 2019

Source: adomonline.com

Why did you watch Major Mahama’s viral video – Defence lawyers grill Pathologist

Two Defence lawyers in the trial of persons accused of murdering Army Major Maxwell Adam Mahama on Tuesday spent hours questioning the Specialist Pathologist who carried out the post mortem.

This focused largely on why he watched the viral video showing a mob lynching the soldier. The lawyers claim this influenced the pathologist’s findings relating to the cause of death.

Dr Lawrence Edusei had stated that the soldier’s death was caused by multiple head injuries.

“In my Opinion, the cause of death is multiple head injuries, this is due to blunt objects like stone, wood, iron rods and shotguns. These are unnatural causes,” Dr. Edusei stated.

But the lawyers maintain this conclusion could not have been arrived at independently as the Doctor had been shown the video recording of the lynching.

Dr. Edusei however insisted that he had written his initial findings prior to watching the video and the cause of death remained same even after watching it.

*The cross examination*

Defence lawyer Theophilus Donkor was the first to raise the issue of the video recording on Tuesday.

*Theophilus Donkor*- “What was the purpose of you watching that video after you had done the post mortem”

*Dr. Edusei*- “After my initial cause of death report had gone out. The new investigators realized that I have added gunshot injury as cause of death. When I was subpoenaed to court, I said there was the need for me to meet them. Because I had tasked he first investigator to do something for me. I never saw him again. The new investigators then arranged to meet me in my office. That’s the time they showed me the video.

*Theophilus Donkor*- “You requested to watch the video?”

*Dr. Edusei*- “No, they came to my office with the video , with the evidence accrued to meet me”

*Theophilus Donkor*- “Is it part of your practice to watch crime scene videos? I am putting it to you that the watching of the video influenced the report you issued?”

*Dr. Edusei*- “My lord not at all”

Dr. Edusei explained his work required that he interacts with investigators and getting information. He argued that this however does not influence his report saying it’s an independent opinion for which reason he’s in the box alone speaking to it.

Another Defence lawyer Augustine Gyamfi also continued with the video issue when he had his turn.

*Augustine Gyamfi*- “What information were you looking for in the video? “

*Dr. Edusei* -“My lord I had finished the post mortem, I had written my findings, I had a preliminary report. The video was to point to them that a gun was used.

*Augustine Gyamfi*- “So you watched the video to point to the video to the police that gun was used? Let that be noted”

Another Defence Lawyer Kwame Owusu who had his turn and asked whether post mortem reports generally are conclusive such that another pathologist cannot arrives at a different conclusion. Dr. Edusei said arriving at a different conclusion is possible

*Background*

The pathologist is the State’s 13th witness out of a total of 14 witnesses listed to testify in the court. 14 persons including then Assembly man of Denkyria Obuasi William Baah are standing trial over the death of the soldier in May 2017.

*Last witness*

A police investigator is expected to be the state last witness once Dr. Edusei is discharged by the court.